Have you ever seen military or war movies where the prison commander lines up all the prisoners and informs them that he will shoot down one at a time unless the specific prisoner guilty of whatever steps forward and confesses to whatever?

Kind of grinds you if nobody talks and the commander actually starts killing the guys one by one, doesn't it?

Now, let's say that you are the commander of the prison, and you know who was the guilty one. Would you not call that guy to step forward, and then shoot down only him - rather than everyone one by one?

I know I would. There is no point in genocide against innocent guys....or gals:

Joshua 7:1 But the people of Israel broke faith in regard to the devoted things; for Achan the son of Carmi, son of Zabdi, son of Zerah, of the tribe of Judah, took some of the devoted things; and the anger of the LORD burned against the people of Israel.
7:18 and he brought near his household man by man, and Achan the son of Carmi, son of Zabdi, son of Zerah, of the tribe of Judah, was taken.
7:19 Then Joshua said to Achan, "My son, give glory to the LORD God of Israel, and render praise to him; and tell me now what you have done; do not hide it from me."
7:20 And Achan answered Joshua, "Of a truth I have sinned against the LORD God of Israel, and this is what I did:
7:24 And Joshua and all Israel with him took Achan the son of Zerah, and the silver and the mantle and the bar of gold, and his sons and daughters, and his oxen and asses and sheep, and his tent, and all that he had; and they brought them up to the Valley of Achor.
Josh 22:20 Did not Achan the son of Zerah break faith in the matter of the devoted things, and wrath fell upon all the congregation of Israel? And he did not perish alone for his iniquity.'"

John 11:50 you do not understand that it is expedient for you that one man should die for the people, and that the whole nation should not perish."

Similarly, a police officer firing his drawn service pistol does not fire at everyone in a crowd, but only against the felon criminal deserving to get shot at.

The traffic cop does not flash his squad car's blue and red lights against everyone he can on a freeway, but only against the one speeder he is targeting and intends to stop.

In stark contrast, the terrorist frequently leaves his or her roadside bomb to go off against any random vehicle that triggers it - even blowing up one of his or her own comrades if they're not warned about it. The terrorist who has explosives strapped to himself or herself, or walks into a crowded area with a pressed-trigger hand grenade ready to let it loose at whatever time he or she chooses, plans to blow up not only himself or herself (for whatever ridiculously-counterproductive delusionally-murderous cause) but also innocent people (friend or foe) at random - whoever happens to haplessly be there at the time.

That is realistically not good for whatever cause for whoever!

At least hitmen assassins and car-bomb professionals target only one victim with their high-powered rifle crosshairs or explosives-wiring techniques.....hopefully only if that one target deserves such targeting.

It is both problematic and lamentable when retaliation is inflicted by an angered person on one or more who certainly do not deserve such persecution and infliction.

For example, if an irresponsible sometimes-anonymous girl briefly flashes an unusual amount of her nudity to some erotically-arousable guy and then quickly moves on to a safe haven of some sort, the man (damnably now made into a suddenly-incited rapist) might consider taking out his promptly-built-up sexual desire on some innocent modestly-dressed woman who did nothing whatsoever to merit molestation.

Deuteronomy 22:25 "But if in the open country a man meets a young woman who is betrothed, and the man seizes her and lies with her, then only the man who lay with her shall die.

As you can see, it behooves a potential rapist to make sure that the human female he targets for assault and whatever sexual connection involved is not engaged to some guy, and instead carefully selects a non-armed non-VD-infected (hopefully-virgin?) non-married immodest female to molest, with the following follow-up:

Exodus 22:16 If a man seduces a virgin who is not betrothed, and lies with her, he shall give the marriage present for her, and make her his wife.
Exodus 22:17 If her father utterly refuses to give her to him, he shall pay money equivalent to the marriage present for virgins.
Exodus 22:19 Whoever lies with a beast shall be put to death.

Deuteronomy 22:28 "If a man meets a virgin who is not betrothed, and seizes her and lies with her, and they are found,
Deuteronomy 22:29 then the man who lay with her shall give to the father of the young woman fifty shekels of silver, and she shall be his wife, because he has violated her; he may not put her away all his days.

By now, it should become clear to the reader that what is being mentioned are two types of WMD's (that is: Weapons of Mass Defilement), one of which are diabolical seasonal items consisting of women's "fashions" and "styles" quasi-clothing such as sleevesless shirts meant to bare naked arms to general public view, shorts and swimwear meant to expose nude legs to general public view, and sandals or flip-flops meant to expose bare toes to general public view as primary WMDs....then PG-13 photos and videos of the same on computer screens, in magazines, newspapers, etc. as graphical-image representations (secondary WMDs) reflecting primary WMDs previously mentioned as a basis for more-severe imagery of sometimes-private and more complete indecent exposure of the R and X and XXX-rated categories.

WILL there be unilateral disarmament concerning what was stated above? WILL everyone cooperate with enforced signed treaties so as to not spew out any immodest radioactive fallout at any time on the planet which sadistically-dispersed lewdness would damage especially male human lifeforms situated peacefully within the environment?

At this point, it should be mentioned that inanimate manufactured items such as sleevesless shirts and shorts and swimwear and sandals are NOT the problem which as separate or combined entites benigning existing do not cause defilement, but instead the perverts and pervertesses misadvertising and misusing them. Similarly, guns (along with rocks and ropes and kitchen knives and hammers and electricity and poison and gravity and so on) do not kill, but instead people kill:

Col 2:20 If with Christ you died to the elemental spirits of the universe, why do you live as if you still belonged to the world? Why do you submit to regulations,
Col 2:21 "Do not handle, Do not taste, Do not touch"
Col 2:22 (referring to things which all perish as they are used), according to human precepts and doctrines?

Sleevesless shirts and shorts and swimwear and sandals can be used with no one else around for whatever sundry purposes, as they can when at home in private with one's own spouse or spice.

Related to all that are cases involving indiscriminate random placement of publicly-accessible porn among both the innocent and the guilty (the decently-clothed and the immodestly attired). But selective discrimination as to precise, strictly-limited, and timely placement of such lewd time bombs is instead what at least should be considered:

Jeremiah 31:30 But every one shall die for his own sin; each man who eats sour grapes, his teeth shall be set on edge.

Ezekiel 18:20 The soul that sins shall die. The son shall not suffer for the iniquity of the father, nor the father suffer for the iniquity of the son; the righteousness of the righteous shall be upon himself, and the wickedness of the wicked shall be upon himself.

Luke 23:15 ...Hey, nothing deserving death has been done by him;
Luke 23:22 A third time he said to them, "Why, what evil has he done? I have found in him no crime deserving death; I will therefore chastise him and release him."
Acts 13:28 Though they could charge him with nothing deserving death, yet they asked Pilate to have him killed.
Acts 23:29 I found that he was accused about questions of their law, but charged with nothing deserving death or imprisonment.
Acts 25:25 But I found that he had done nothing deserving death; and as he himself appealed to the emperor, I decided to send him.

Understandably, it would be best to accordingly and proportionally punish ONLY temporarily?-immodest human female(s) who caused the whole crisis in the first place:

Song 2:15 Catch us the foxes, the little foxes, that spoil the vineyards, for our vineyards are in blossom."

Such "catching" does not necessarily mean inconveniently capturing errantly-immodest gals for involuntary sexual-bondage utlization and consequential false-imprisonment legal implications, but preferably means citing, fining, and even temporarily jailing such harassing sexual offenders by either citizens-arrest initiation or instead 911 cellphone pleas placed to appropriate and accomodating law-enforcement officials.

So, concerning contemplation of making porn available to the general public at large for retributional purposes, it would be ideal to quaranteen and confine sexually-offender harassing gals and force them only them (who themselves have in effect forced non-soliciting guys to glance at what those guys never asked for) the retributional porn pictures to proverbially "show them how dirty their faces are in a mirror" - or better yet, cornering the possibly-viciously-defensive girls and confront them with pertinent anti-immodesty holy-hair Bible verses specifying exactly their immodest offense - whether mopheaded loose long hair (see RSV's and NASV's Numbers 5:18 in context and Song 7:5 in context), sleeveslessly naked arms (see Second Samuel 13:18 in the RSV and NASV though not KJV-type Bibles), slackslessly nude legs (see Isaiah 47:1-3), soxlessly-exposed-toes feet (see Jeremiah 2:25), tops of buttocks crack (see Isaiah 20:4), bared-crotch pussy (see Isaiah 3:17), etc. in relation to God-through-Saint-Paul's directive for more-gullible-than-men non-abortive inferior-gender to be "adorned modestly in decent attire" according to First Timothy 2:8-15.

One also considers the possibility of making it easier for guys wanting to self-sodomizingly (i.e. masturbationally) lust and ejaculate by facilitating rather immediate access to free porn (of whatever seasonally-variational types and degrees) without them having to waste much time and energy and money laboriously and embarrassingly searching for it.

Certainly, some geographical areas at certain times of day and night where such fellows would probably congregate and be located, as within an "adult" bookstore, erotic magazine or video shop, or internet-accessible computers placed facing certain corners within public libraries could contain or access reliably-residing porn designated for such eventually-impotentizing-during-later-years deviations.

At least the besieged-by-real-life-mophead-pornies fellows of anonymity would have somewhat of a virtual fantasy controlled and easily-manipulated relationship with the very-real gals either having voluntarily or involuntarily posed for the real photos of equally-anonymous-to-most-viewers all-nude late-teen-and-early-20s-aged harlots-by-default, which media images which he, at his whims, captures and saves (or then deletes) to harddrives or thumbdrives off the internet. Such non-reproductive quasi-relationships between him and his gals who posed (for whoever at the time) would likely not be the type in which he knows the actual names and locations of the gals shown and therefore is not able to physically touch nor massage them and more, nor the gals themselves know the names and locations of the guys enjoying their naked pics and vids (and similarly not be physically touched nor massaged and more by them), so the relationships-of-sorts would be, for both, virtually fornicative or adulterous, plus disappointingly closed-ended.

But how insidious it is when innocent onlookers and bystanders who happen to accidently pass by get visually assaulted also - whether by in-motion life-sized porn of real people or by images of such on computer-screen and TV monitors. That is not unlike the situation in the 1920s and 1930s when Chicagoland and other gangsters elsewhere hit bystanders also in the process of gunning down opposing mafia family associates during inner-city turf wars.

In conclusion, if one seriously and thoughtfully considers it expedient, worth it, and viable to non-dangerously target porn view only to and against certain immodest offending girls and women, one must do all he or she can to make sure - as much as possible - that innocent modest people are not also included in the retaliatory porn attack. Strategically and tactically, "collateral damage" in surprise-attack porn-presentation demolition against dirty-minded and dirty-misdressed (publicly-immodest) female sexual offenders (carelessly or deliberately obsessed with particularly-seasonal licentious and lascivious exhibitionism) must to be kept at an absolute minimum for the well-being of the entire community:

Genesis 18:23 Then Abraham drew near, and said, "Will You indeed destroy the righteous with the wicked?
18:24 Suppose there are fifty righteous within the city; will You then destroy the place and not spare it for the fifty righteous who are in it?
18:25 Far be it from You to do such a thing, to slay the righteous with the wicked, so that the righteous fare as the wicked! Far be that from You! Shall not the Judge of all the Earth do right?"
18:28 Suppose five of the fifty righteous are lacking? Will You destroy the whole city for lack of five?" And He said, "I will not destroy it if I find forty-five there."
Genesis 20:4 Now Abimelech had not approached her; so he said, "Lord, will You slay an innocent people?